2022-11-16

 

Cuba tiene la disposición de recibir vuelos de deportados y, actualmente, las partes acuerdan los términos y condiciones para estos vuelos, detenidos con la COVID-19. Foto: Endrys Correa Vaillant

«Nosotros nunca hemos puesto una barrera, ha sido el bloqueo el que ha puesto las barreras».

La respuesta que el Primer Secretario del Partido y Presidente de la República, Miguel Díaz-Canel Bermúdez, dio a la agencia de prensa estadounidense AP, en la apertura de la 38va. Feria Internacional de La Habana, es aplicable a todos los problemas que ha generado la política hostil del Gobierno de Estados Unidos contra Cuba, sobre todo, mediante el bloqueo económico, comercial y financiero.

El bloqueo recrudecido también ha sido causa agravante de la situación migratoria actual entre los dos países, así como el incumplimiento del acuerdo bilateral sobre el tema, que fueron tópicos en las conversaciones migratorias entre representantes de ambas naciones, realizadas ayer en La Habana, a fin de evitar el trasiego de personas de manera irregular, insegura y desordenada. 

Cuba reiteró su preocupación por el impacto negativo del bloqueo y las medidas de reforzamiento extremo aplicadas por el Gobierno de EE. UU. desde 2019. «No hay duda de que una política dirigida a deprimir el nivel de vida de la población constituye un estímulo directo a emigrar», manifestó a la prensa el viceministro de Relaciones Exteriores, Carlos Fernández de Cossío, quien encabezó la delegación cubana.

Como otro estímulo denunció la vigencia de la Ley de Ajuste Cubano, y el trato preferencial que reciben los cubanos que entran de forma ilegal a EE. UU.

Aseveró, igualmente, que la migración irregular provoca pérdidas de vidas, y crea condiciones para otros fenómenos como el fraude migratorio, la trata y el tráfico ilícito de personas.

Fernández de Cossío calificó la reunión de útil y constructiva, en la cual las partes pasaron revista al cumplimiento de los Acuerdos migratorios bilaterales, y se reconocieron los pasos dados en los últimos meses para asegurar una implementación efectiva de estos.

Apuntó que la delegación cubana acogió con beneplácito el anuncio de la reanudación total de los servicios de visado de inmigrantes en la Embajada de EE. UU. en La Habana, a partir del 4 de enero de 2023.

Respecto al proceso de repatriación de los migrantes que se consideran inadmisibles, detalló que Cuba tiene la disposición de recibir vuelos de deportados y, actualmente, las partes acuerdan los términos y condiciones para estos vuelos, detenidos con la COVID-19.

ZELENSKY debe capitular y aceptar que perdío la guerra

 

Continuación: operaciones especiales en línea el 20 de julio

El pueblo de Novye Yurkovichi en la región de Bryansk fue atacado con fuego de artillería desde el territorio de Ucrania. Además, las Fuerzas Armadas de Ucrania dispararon hoy contra varios asentamientos en la RPD. En el contexto del aumento de los ataques con cohetes del ejército ucraniano, la región de Kherson está fortaleciendo su sistema de defensa aérea. Al mismo tiempo, los especialistas han comenzado a restaurar la infraestructura en Lisichansk, Severodonetsk y otras ciudades de la LPR. El Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de Rusia pidió una amplia participación de organizaciones internacionales en el próximo tribunal sobre militantes ucranianos, y las autoridades de la región de Kherson pidieron que se celebre un tribunal contra Vladimir Zelensky en Kyiv. Lo que está sucediendo en Ucrania, en Rusia y en el mundo el 19 de julio de 2022 en el contexto de una operación especial para proteger el Donbass, en la transmisión en vivo de Izvestia.

 

SERBIA: PRAYER FOR SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY READ AT EVERY SERVICE

Belgrade, September 14, 2022

spc.rsspc.rs    

According to the decision of His Holiness Patriarch Porfirije, a prayer for the sanctity of marriage and family and harmony and peace in the nation is now read at every service in all churches and monasteries.

The decision was made, “considering the challenges and temptations that our Church and its faithful people are facing,” the Serbian Church reports.

Tens of thousands of Serbian Orthodox faithful came out to the Cathedral of St. Sava in Belgrade earlier this week for a moleben for the sanctity of marriage and the family and harmony and peace in Serbia.

The prayer rally and the Patriarch’s decision to have the prayer read at all services are part of a fight for traditional morality against movements such as EuroPride, a pan-European LGBT event that was planned to be held in Belgrade this week.

The prayer reads (machine translation):

Lord God, Father, Almighty, Creator of heaven and earth, and of all beings, and man, whom after all other creatures you created in your image and likeness and therefore the most perfect among created beings, you created man as male and female, as one two and two at the same time, and thus from the beginning you instituted marriage, and you commanded: "Be fruitful and multiply", and thus at the same time you instituted the family as a union of love in You, perfected in the holy Mystery of love in Your Christ; You alone, Lord, who loves people, the One, glorified in the Holy Trinity, maintain and multiply Your love, Your grace and Your blessing in every marriage and in every family, in our kindred and in Your whole world, especially in our days, when invisible forces the malice of heaven and visible, conscious and unconscious, their servants,

Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God and Son of Man, our Saviour, You performed Your first divine-human miracle, a sign of Your love for humanity, precisely at a wedding, a wedding in Cana of Galilee, and thereby You showed and proved that marriage is honorable and the matrimonial bed is blameless, which was confirmed by all your holy apostles and disciples, who godly and rightly called you, in addition to everything else, the Bridegroom of Your Church, and her Your Bride, especially Your holy apostle Paul, who boldly and divinely inspired mentioned the love and unity of husband and wife as the image of the love and unity of You and Your holy Church; You Yourself, Christ the Lord, maintain and multiply Your love, Your grace and Your blessing in every marriage and in every family, in our kindred and in Your whole world, especially in our days, when the invisible forces of malice in the heavens and visible, conscious and unconscious, their servants,

Holy Spirit, gentle Comforter, every living soul lives through You, You enlighten and sanctify everything and everyone, You have given us all the earthly and earthly goods that, by the grace of God and the Father, the Lord and God and Savior provided for us in His House of Salvation our Jesus Christ; You Yourself, Spirit of Truth, Source of goods and Giver of life, come to us, Your unworthy servants, and dwell in us, and cleanse us from all impurity, and call us and all our brothers and sisters to repentance, and save , Good, our souls.

O Our Most Holy Mistress, always a Virgin, Mother of God, role model, guide and intercessor for all who live either in chastity and virginity or in the chastity of an honorable and blessed marriage, You, with your motherly love and your all-encompassing prayer cover, call and lead us to repentance and all our neighbors, cleanse us from all impurity, physical and spiritual, and enable us, All-blameless, to imitate your sinless life on earth and your constant service to Your Son and to Your God and to us.

Our venerable fathers and our mothers, you who please God by living either in angelic celibacy or in the grace of marriage and family union, all of you who glorified the Lord of glory with purity, virtue and holiness, who glorified you in His Kingdom, in His holy Church, pray to Him for us and for all our brothers and sisters in Christ! Amen.

Follow OrthoChristian on Twitter, Vkontakte, Telegram, WhatsApp, MeWe, an

 

I THINK I WOULD BECOME A PRIEST IF I WERE EVER RELEASED”

The life of Ioan Ianolide, who spent twenty-three years in prison for Christ. Part 3

Part 1. The The Life of Ioan Ianolide

Part 2. To Hell and Back

The second trial

​Ioan Ianolide. Photo attached to the interrogation protocol, 1958​Ioan Ianolide. Photo attached to the interrogation protocol, 1958    

After the Soviet troops left Romania in 1958, the Securitate (the Department of State Security) hastened to launch a new wave of arrests to prevent the population from revolting against the “people’s democracy”. Many “enemies of the people” imprisoned in the first wave of arrests in 1948 had already been released, and the Communist Party was eager to send them back to the siguranță.1 So the Securitate tried to extend the terms of those who hadn’t yet been released. This explains why on a cold autumn evening of 1958, Ioan was taken from Aiud to Bucharest for new interrogations. He once again had to go through terrible torture and bitter humiliation.

There were mainly two charges against him: that he had allegedly put together a gang of Legionnaires in Targu Ocna Hospital and ordered those who were released to maintain the organization’s combat capability and arrange a counter-revolution against the “working class”.

The charges were absurd. The most natural Christian practices that he and other confessors performed at Targu Ocna were declared by the Securitate as “Legionnaire activities.” So during interrogations, Ioan was surprised to hear that “a wedding can be called a ‘counter-revolutionary Legionnaire meeting’, a baptismal gift, ‘Legionnaire assistance provided for anti-State purposes’, and a pilgrimage to a monastery, a ‘Legionnaire training campaign with the aim of seizing political power’, and many similarly absurd interpretations.”

Another serious charge against Ioan was the twelve Christian principles that he had formulated at Targu Ocna and then used to lift the spirits of inmates in the prisons he would go to. Written down by Priest Constantin Voicescu after his release on a book that had been confiscated from him in 1959 during a new arrest, these principles were also classified by the Securitate as Legionnaire:

“A copy of the instructions on Legionnaire activities elaborated by the defendant Ion Ianolide, distributed among the Legionnaires and restored in 1954 by the defendant Constantin Voicescu and Vasile Petrescu on the pages of Simion Mehedinţi’s book, Trilogies.”

In fact, these principles, full of theological depth, were compiled by Valeriu together with Ioan on the basis of the spiritual experience accumulated by them over the years of suffering.

But the Securitate regarded Valeriu and Ioan as the leaders of the “mystical” atmosphere created at Targu Ocna, and since Valeriu was dead, the burden of accusations of “intrigues” now fell on Ioan’s shoulders. After five months of exhausting interrogations Ioan fell into a miserable state, and so he was sent for rehabilitation to the Văcărești Prison hospital2. This measure, of course, wasn’t taken for reasons of humanity, but so that no traces of inhuman treatment could be seen on him at the trial.

​Interior of the Văcărești Prison church​Interior of the Văcărești Prison church    

When he was taken to court at the Bucharest Military Tribunal, he finally had the opportunity to see his parents after years of separation. But when they led him past his mother, she didn’t even recognize him and exclaimed:

“Whose’s this one, the poor thing?!”

He was so mutilated and disfigured that his own mother didn’t recognize him.

When given a word to say, Ioan confessed:

“I discussed Christian matters with all the prisoners. There was not a single inmate with whom I didn’t discuss Christian problems and principles. I think I would become a priest too, if I were ever released.”

Moreover, he took it upon himself to defend all the prisoners:

“None of the defendants are guilty! Give these people freedom, let them return to their families!”

​Bucharest Military Tribunal​Bucharest Military Tribunal    

But of course, sentences came one after the other, because it was a mock and the decisions had been prepared ahead of time; so twenty-nine people were immediately sentenced to terms ranging from fifteen years to life with forced labor. They were again thrown into prison for the same reason—their confession of Christ. The terrorist regime couldn’t forgive them this, particularly Ioan who was sentenced to another twenty-five years of forced labor.

At Jilava

In April 1960, Ioan was sent to Jilava Prison, to the hell of the terrible butcher Maromet. On the transfer card, in the “degree of danger” column, highlighted in red and circled were the words, “Attention! A very dangerous Legionnaire!” Meek and innocent, Ioan was declared socially dangerous. Pious and well-mannered, he “posed a great threat to the social order.” But the Securitate was right in its own way, because in those days the confession of Christ posed a mortal danger to Communist atheism.

​Jilava, maximum security prison. Photo: Daria Raducanu​Jilava, maximum security prison. Photo: Daria Raducanu    

On his arrival, Ioan was thrown into one of the most overcrowded Jilava torture chambers. George Ungureanu, one of the sufferers who was sitting in the cell when Ioan entered, later wrote that “one evening, before food was served, a prisoner was brought into the chamber—tall, handsome, with a bundle under his arm and a bloodstained handkerchief at his mouth:

‘Do you see him?’ the guard shouted from the doorstep. ‘He has been imprisoned for over twenty years and is sick. He needs a plank-bed beneath a window!’

‘My name is Ioan Ianolide. I have been in prison since 1941, since my student years. I have tuberculosis, I spit blood. Look.’ He showed us his handkerchief and then proceeded, ‘Besides, I have another disease: I cannot keep my balance. They used to hit me on the head and I shake continuously! Is there a priest among you? If so, I ask him to bless me!’

‘Lord, bless brother Ioan who is now one of us!’ Priest Buzău Popescu exclaimed.

“After this blessing, there was commotion in the cell for several minutes. None of the prisoners wanted to sacrifice their place to Ioan who desperately needed air to dull the symptoms of tuberculosis. Ianolide, having seen enough of all sorts of squabbles over the years of his imprisonment, sat down calmly on the bed of Romeo Pușcașu next to the door.

“Ioan Ianolide had spent over twenty of his thirty-eight years in Romanian prisons, but he did not lose two great gifts of God: spiritual and physical beauty. Alongside the other prisoners he looked like a saint, although over two decades he had gone through all the tortures that the devilish mind of evil people could invent, cold and hunger, war and death, typhus and tuberculosis.

“Such tortures cannot be compared with those of the first Christians, who were burned alive and fed to wild beasts; but still, they suffered for several minutes and died, whereas Ioan was tormented for decades.

“When quarrels or conversations began in the cell, Ianolide would withdraw into himself and read psalms without losing peace of mind. He was a model of life in a prison, living with a halo of holiness.”

He stayed at Jilava until November 1960, when he was sent to Gherla Prison, and then again sent to Aiud Prison.

Hopelessly sick and incapable of being re-educated

In 1962, the last wave of “re-education” of political prisoners began. Then the ruling party, under pressure from international forces, had to release political prisoners. But since the princes of this world were afraid to release “class enemies” without breaking them, the last stage of re-education of political prisoners was launched. The inhuman process of mutilation of souls was led by Colonel Gheorghe Crăciun, head of Aiud Prison from 1958 to1964.

The methods were much milder than at Pitești Prison, but the goal was the same. Instead of torture and violence they promised to release prisoners if they agreed to cooperate, and in case of refusal they resorted to starving, isolation and blackmail. They began to open cultural and educational clubs, where “cultural” education meant re-education in the spirit of Marxism and Communism.

Ioan was also subjected to the re-education process, but remained unaffected by the last diabolical onslaught and was never “re-educated.” This is demonstrated by the description given by Colonel Crăciun in July 1963:

“In general, this type is unyielding and fanatical. Starting from 1962, he became involved in cultural and educational work, but from the very beginning he took a clearly hostile position towards cultural work. At the present time he adheres to the same position, which allows no concessions, exerting a negative influence on fellow inmates. He is no longer involved in work.”

Subsequently, pressure was stopped, because he was taken to the eleventh tuberculosis department as “hopelessly ill and bedridden.”

Release” to the giant prison of Romania

Finally, in 1964, a decree on a general amnesty for political prisoners was issued. But prisoners were told that they wouldn’t be released unless they were re-educated. It was a desperate attempt by the regime to muddle the minds of the martyrs at the last moment. And yet, during July, groups of sufferers left the hell of Aiud, and on July 31 Ioan was given a certificate of release and a train ticket to Bucharest. “I was shocked and wept bitterly,” Ioan recalled those moments of mental shock.

Thus, after twenty-three years of indescribable suffering, with joints stiff from rheumatism and tuberculosis, Ioan left his last prison to enter the giant prison of Communist Romania. Not knowing who he would see in his house, he decided to go to his aunt first. Throughout the journey he wept, thinking about the terrifying prospects opening up in a Communist society.

Having alighted at the North Railway Station, he looked around for his fiancé, but neither she, nor anyone else was waiting for him. No one needed him, and he was a nobody among strangers.

North Railway Station in Bucharest. Photo: Daniel BranishtyanNorth Railway Station in Bucharest. Photo: Daniel Branishtyan    

Finally, together with an ex-fellow prisoner, he reached his aunt. He was received with a storm of emotions and a sea of tears, but the joy was short-lived as the final blow awaited him. He learned that his mother had passed away three years before, and his ex-fiancé Valentina had married another man a year before after waiting for him for eighteen years and not knowing whether he was still alive. Ioan’s heart nearly broke at that news.

“I writhed all over and burst into a voiceless cry that will never subside in my soul. Everything collapsed and turned into ruins, and I was turned into a ghost, a chimera. But I relied on the will of my relatives. And hand in hand with two old people I entered a new, hostile, devastated world.”

Soon he was admitted to a hospital for rehabilitation, and soon Valentina came to see him. She said that she would divorce her husband and return to him. But Ioan refused, considering the sacrament of marriage higher than betrothal. Once again he gave up all the best he had in life for Christ’s sake.

After regaining some strength, he wanted to enter a monastery, but the authorities who controlled monastic life did not allow him to do it. And God hastened to send him a wonderful wife for his endless suffering. A year after his release, Ioan married Constanța, who selflessly took care of him till his last breath.

Ioan and Constanța Ianolide, 1965Ioan and Constanța Ianolide, 1965    

To earn a living, he got a job first at the laboratory of the Geological Institute of Romania, and then at a cooperative for the production of artwork, and worked from home.

Ioan cautiously tried to share the ideas he was burning with, but in the atmosphere of terror dominated by an anti-religious mentality implanted by the Communists he found a very small audience. Then he tried to move abroad, but he was denied a foreign passport and wasn’t allowed to leave the country.

So he had to live in a world hostile to his sensitive soul, bearing the stigma of an “enemy of the people.” He couldn’t defend himself from this humiliation in any way and silently forgave everyone. Hurt by the incessant carping of the “working people,” he withdrew into himself and devoted all his time to prayer and carving crosses, icons, and other religious items.

Final years of his life

Although the Securitate watched him vigilantly, intrigued against him and threatened him with death, Ioan decided to risk everything again and leave a written testimony about what he had seen and experienced in Communist prisons. For three years, from 1981 to 1984, under constant fear of being caught by the Securitate, he filled hundreds of pages with bitter memories from the depths of his holy soul.

To avoid being exposed he made himself three lamps with wooden boxes decorated with plastic ornaments at the base of each one. Into them he inserted other, smaller boxes made of tin, into which he hid each page as soon as he finished it. On one of these pages he made the following remark:

“I wrote in a hurry, furtively, on my own and without corrections. Please proofread my writing. I had no documents, no friends with whom I could consult, and I could not even reread what I had written, because once each sheet was filled, I hid it securely.

“I wrote this as a confession. I wrote this as a testament. I wrote in the hope that these lines would outlive me.”

Ioan IanolideIoan Ianolide    

When he completed this last confession of faith, God called him to eternal rest. Shortly after his retirement he contracted cirrhosis, and then a neoplasm appeared on his internal organs, which put an end to the earthly stage of his existence.

Thus, after a life entirely devoted to God, Ioan fell asleep in the Lord on February 5, 1986. His body, which had suffered indescribable torments, rests in the cemetery of Cernica Monastery not far from the grave of his father-confessor whom he found after his release, the bright Fr. Benedict Ghiuș.

​Ioan Ianolide’s grave in the cemetery of Cernica Monastery, Bucharest​Ioan Ianolide’s grave in the cemetery of Cernica Monastery, Bucharest    

One of his last desires was that at his funeral, those who wished would receive the ladanka amulets3 and crosses, which he used to make until his eyesight failed. This was Ioan’s most powerful word to our people: “Bear your cross!” However, the high motto of his whole life is engraved on his grave cross: “All in Christ”.

After his repose

Most of the manuscripts that Ioan wrote in that atmosphere of terror were sent to the West in the hope that they could be published there. In the end, through Fr. Constantin Voicescu’s efforts, after the 1989 Revolution they were returned to their homeland, and then, by Divine Providence, ended up in Diaconești Monastery. Here for two years the manuscripts were carefully put in order, corrected, and as a result they compiled a book entitled, Return to Christ: A Document for a New World.

Diaconești MonasteryDiaconești Monastery    

Ioan’s witness contained in it is amazing. It shakes your soul, because after reading these pages you can’t remain as you were before. The power of his witness brings us closer to Christ, for in it a voice cries out from holy prisons, calling to all generations till the end of the age: “Return to Christ—this is the only chance for mankind to be saved.”

Although he lived in the world as a nameless person whom “no one knew but prison”, the light that he left in history and the spiritual labor that yielded fruit after his death give us the right to say that Ioan Ianolide’s life is an ideal of Christian perfection, and he is our intercessor in Heaven in the host of saints who suffered in the prisons.

Rejoice, O blessed Ioan, long-suffering one of God!

Dan Tudorache
Translation from the Russian version by Dmitry Lapa

Mărturisitorii (Confessors)

11/16/2022

1 The secret police in Romania under the king was called Siguranța (Rom. “security”), it operated from 1921–1944. Under socialism its successor was the Securitate, the department of state security that existed from 1948–1989.

2 The ancient Văcărești Monastery was converted into a prison in 1848. Nevertheless, the magnificent church remained active, and prisoners were its parishioners until 1987, when it was demolished.

3 Ladanka is a tiny cloth bag, usually worn around the neck with a cross, and used for carrying a tiny amount of incense, a prayer written on paper, a particle of relics, or soil from a holy site. They are widely used by lay-people in Russia and several other Orthodox countries.—Trans.

Comments
Here you can leave your comment on the present article, not exceeding 4000 characters. All comments will be read by the editors of OrthoChristian.Com.
Your name: 
Your e-mail: 
Enter the digits, seen on picture:

Passio Domini Nostri Iesu Christi secundum ESTE DIAQCONO CANTA LA PASSIO PUNTO CULMINANTE DE LA LITURGIA ROMANA EXONERA AL PUEBLO ISRAEL DE LA CULPA. FUE UN ASESINATO POLITICO CULPANDO AL SANEDRIN

Passio Domini Nostri Iesu Christi secundum Ioannem ESTA PROXIMA LA RECONCIALIACION CON XTO EMPEZARA UNA NUEVA ERA DE LIBERTAD Y AMOR ANTEX DE LA PARUSIA

Passio Domini Nostri Iesu Christi secundum Ioannem

Rolando Alarcon&Inti-Illimani - 1969 - A La Resistencia Espanola - A La ...

VIVA EL QUINTO REGIMIIENTO A LOS HÉROES QUE MURIERON EN EL FRENTE ESTÁN PRESENTES EN MI ORACIÓN MI MEMORIA DE AMBOS BANDO

VIVA EL QUINTO REGIMIENTO

 Twitter, ¿es el fin del último espacio de libertad real en Occidente?

Publicado:

La propaganda occidental dibuja un mundo en el que la libertad de expresión es un bien supremo al alcance de cualquiera, lo que, además, constituye una excepción a nivel planetario: en el resto del planeta este derecho es vulnerado a cada instante. De hecho, la libertad de expresión sobrevive gracias a sus protectores occidentales. Nada más lejos de la realidad. Occidente es un lugar en el que, como en el resto del planeta, ir contracorriente no es nada recomendable.

He ahí las líneas editoriales. No es que no haya libertad de expresión en los medios de comunicación, es que estos deben ceñirse a la línea editorial marcada. Y sí, ¡Oh, sorpresa!, la mayoría de las líneas editoriales pertenecen a una élite, es cuestión del azar. Vamos que cualquiera puede expresar lo que quiera, otra cuestión es que el altavoz esté siempre en manos de los mismos, los cuales, además, tienen las mismas, o muy parecidas, ideas. Un discurso homogéneo, pétreo y único al que se le añade convenientemente alguna voz extravagante, no sin antes cercenarla, atemorizarla o domesticarla —el despido en medios de comunicación no es nada infrecuente en Occidente, como tampoco el cese de programas, aun con buenas audiencias—. La línea editorial, decíamos.

En este contexto de carencia de libertad de expresión real tras el idílico decorado sostenido, en el que, incluso, un cabo demócrata fue expulsado del Ejército español por firmar un manifiesto antifranquista o yo mismo he sido expulsado de esta misma institución por denunciar corrupción, abusos o privilegios. Manifestaciones contrarias a la disciplina lo llamaron: decir que se cometen abusos o corrupción puede ser cierto —y por tanto punible para los responsables— o falso —y por tanto punible para el que lo asevera—, pero jamás puede constituir una manifestación contraria a la disciplina. En fin, libertad de expresión, ¿no?

Pues en este escenario de carencia de libertad, Twitter representaba un espacio en el que poder opinar con libertad. Un medio en el que desbaratar las operaciones más siniestras del Establishment y sonrojar a los burdos periodistas que trabajan para las élites y sus cloacas. Un lugar en el que los grandes embustes de los medios de comunicación occidentales, sus censuras, sus silencios o sus purgas quedaban al descubierto. Un Fiscal General que permitía a la ciudadanía controlar a los medios de comunicación y que estos supieran que no podían cometer una barbaridad sin que esta se convirtiera en viral.

"Da miedo que uno de los pocos espacios de libertad que existen en Occidente quede en manos de un tipo que entra por primera vez a las oficinas de una compañía recién adquirida con un lavabo entre los brazos".

Un ejemplo de ello lo podemos encontrar en una de esas columnas de opinión que sirven para cubrir la cuota mínima para alcanzar la pluralidad en el diario El País, Eva Güimil escribió: "Me pregunto qué pensó esa España que no tuitea cuando Ferreras miró dramáticamente a cámara, como si en lugar de al minuto de oro aspirase al Globo de Oro, y aseguró que sí, que iba a hablar de los audios de Villarejo. ¿Qué audios?".

Como explicaba, Twitter es esencial para el control de los medios de comunicación. O lo era, al menos.

Y en estas llegó Elon Musk

Las cifras son mareantes, aun cuando han necesitado de siete meses de regateo y no poco esperpento: 44.000 millones de dólares. Tras lo cual, Elon Musk, el hombre más rico del mundo, entró en la compañía con un lavabo en las manos. Da miedo que uno de los pocos espacios de libertad que existen en Occidente quede en manos de un tipo que entra por primera vez a las oficinas de una compañía recién adquirida con un lavabo entre los brazos. Es cierto que se trató de un juego de palabras, pero no resulta lo más higiénico.

"The bird is freed", aseveró el magnate nada más confirmar la adquisición de Twitter. Poco después la cuenta de Amber Heard desaparecía de Twitter, parece que eliminada por ella misma. La actriz norteamericana, actriz principal de uno de los procesos judiciales más seguidos de la historia, también fue novia del magnate sudafricano, por lo que todo tipo de teorías se desataron tras la desaparición de su cuenta.

Sin embargo, aunque todo resulta bastante confuso, como cuando un elefante entra en una cacharrería —un día se despiden empleados y al día siguiente se les llama para que regresen a la empresa—, todo parece ir en sentido contrario: Twitter se convertirá en un espacio de libertad total. Puede que de libertinaje. Veremos. Lo que nadie puede negar es que la red social evolucionará.

Los cambios que se esperan

Es cierto que Twitter no era un espacio libre por completo, por ejemplo, las cuentas de RT fueron identificadas como cuentas asociadas al gobierno ruso. Una identificación que, teniendo en cuenta los episodios acaecidos, bien convendría que también hubiera sido aplicada a otros medios o periodistas, empezando por La Sexta de Antonio García Ferreras o Ana Pastor.

Twitter cumplía una doble función. Por un lado, proporcionaba la libertad de expresión que no existe en los medios de comunicación occidentales y, por otra parte, permitía que la sociedad más concienciada tuviera una vía de escape en la que mostrar su desencanto. 

Pero, en definitiva, Twitter funcionaba y cumplía una doble función. Por un lado, proporcionaba la libertad de expresión que, en realidad, no existe en los medios de comunicación occidentales, dotando a la sociedad, sino de la imprescindible pluralidad ideológica, sí al menos de unas tonalidades que garabateaban en un inmenso cementado gris. Y, por otra parte, permitía que la sociedad más concienciada tuviera una vía de escape en la que mostrar su desencanto. Una plaza pública a la que acudir para desahogarse.

Para bien o para mal, los cambios van a llegar a la plaza, ya que Elon Musk quiere, ante todo, que resulte rentable —perdía millones al día—. Para ello, pretende reducir el número de empleados —sus primeras estimaciones fueron reducir un 75 % de los 7.500 empleados, lo que parece que no será viable—, incorporar vías para la suscripción y, sobre todo, crear 'X', una aplicación que imite la evolución de WeChat, la aplicación china, que se convirtió en una plataforma multinacional para el comercio electrónico, la salud, las suscripciones o las formas de pago desde un simple servicio de mensajería.

Reto mayúsculo que nadie sabe muy bien cómo afectará a los actuales niveles de libertad de la red social, por mucho que el magnate sudafricano se presente como un "absolutista de la libertad de expresión". Porque, aunque sabemos que el nivel de desinformación, noticias falsas y mensajes de odio puede aumentar —ya se habla del regreso de Donald Trump—, este no es el principal problema de la red —los propios medios occidentales son foco de desinformación en múltiples ocasiones—. El principal problema, la trascendental pregunta que millones de personas tienen en la cabeza, va mucho más allá: ¿es el fin del último espacio de libertad en Occidente?

Las declaraciones y opiniones expresadas en este artículo son de exclusiva responsabilidad de su autor y no representan necesariamente el punto de vista de RT.