2026-06-30

 

Three Christian Stories by Chekhov about Life Without Love

Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.


(1 Corinthians 13:1)

In the modern world, the word “nightmare” is strongly associated with horror movies, serial killers, or otherworldly phenomena. However, Anton Pavlovich Chekhov, with his subtle perception of the Russian soul, wrote several stories with such profound psychological insight that the true horror lies not on the screen, but within one’s own heart.

Without love, life turns into a nightmare. And the worst part is that we turn it into a nightmare when, instead of reaching out to help, we demand that others conform to our selfish fantasies.

Three of Chekhov’s short stories, written from 1886 to 1887—“The Witch,” “The Nightmare,” and “The Cossack,” depict this human tragedy in its progression. Arranged in chronological order, they present a chilling portrayal of the spiritual degradation of a person devoid of love.

The Witch”: Diagnosis—Lack of Love

Illustration by Alexander Apsit for the story "The Witch"Illustration by Alexander Apsit for the story "The Witch"    

The first story, published in the newspaper Novoye Vremya on March 8, 1886, was “The Witch.”

The story takes place in a winter blizzard, in a secluded parish house. Saveliy Gikin, a gloomy and distrustful deacon, lives with his young wife, Raisa. Their marriage has long been a living hell, with Saveliy constantly accusing his wife of infidelity and calling her a witch. One day, a lost postman and a coachman stop at the lodge to wait out the blizzard. Raisa, exhausted by her husband’s loneliness and coldness, suddenly comes to life, becomes beautiful, and tries to get the postman to stay. Saveliy sees this not as a woman’s longing for warmth and attention, but as a “demonic possession” and witchcraft. He watches his wife with hatred. The postman leaves. The couple is left alone again, two people who hate each other and are forced to live together. The torture continues.

What do we see? A man of the clergy who knows the church calendar and performs the rituals, but does not know the most important thing—love for God and his neighbor. Without it, everything in his life is poisoned:

  • By mistrust, and watches his wife’s every move with suspicion;

  • by cunning—he is unscrupulous, but he judges others;

  • by pride—he considers himself a sufferer, and her a devil;

  • by judging—he doesn’t try to understand what his lonely young wife wants, but immediately labels her.

She answers him in kind. She considers him the main culprit of her ruined, unhappy life.

Judge not, that ye be not judged (Matthew 7:1). Saveliy constantly judges his wife, but he never judges himself. It is easier for him to believe in demonic schemes, magic, and “sabatoge” than to honestly look into his own heart and admit, “I am responsible for my own unhappiness.”

Here, Chekhov touches on a surprisingly important spiritual theme. Behind all the superstitions, the belief in witchcraft, the evil eye, and sorcery, lies the same thing: the unwillingness to look at oneself honestly and to repent. It is easier and more pleasant for a person to blame others than to admit the truth about himself.

Behind all the superstitions, the belief in witchcraft, the evil eye, and sorcery, lies the same thing: the unwillingness to look at oneself honestly and to repent.

“The Witch” is not a story about mysticism. It is a story about how a person drives love out of their life and calls it, “fighting evil.”

And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing. (1 Corinthians 13:2). Saveliy has his ordination, but without love, he is nothing. Raisa, with all her sinful impulsiveness, lives, dreams, and longs for warmth. But he only smolders in anger. Without love, a person is doomed to an empty, angry, and resentful existence, destroying himself and everyone around him.

We will not be saved by any spiritual title, education, or work—by any earthly achievements. Only love saves, which beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things. (1 Cor. 13:7).

Nightmare”: the disease strikes another

Illustration by V. F. Vasilyev for A. P. Chekhov’s short story "Nightmare"Illustration by V. F. Vasilyev for A. P. Chekhov’s short story "Nightmare"Just three weeks later, on March 29, 1886, the short story “The Nightmare” appeared in the same newspaper. It is not a horror story, as the title might suggest.

Pavel Mikhailovich Kunin, a member of the Committee on Peasant Affairs, arrives in the village of Borisovo and takes on the task of opening a parish school in Sinkovo. However, after failing to find funds for the school and becoming disillusioned with the local priest, Fr. Yakov (who appears to be slovenly and indifferent), Kunin writes a denunciation of Fr. Yakov to the bishop. Later, Fr. Yakov approaches Kunin with a request that he hire him as a scribe for 10 rubles per month due to the family’s dire financial situation. After that, Kunin feels ashamed of his denunciation and his own past expenditures, and his impulses for “useful activity” fade away.

What is this story about? It is not only and not so much about the difficult life of village priests in pre-revolutionary Russia. The main point is that we should always strive to understand another person and their real life, rather than substituting this understanding with our own fantasies.

Kunin has already created a portrait of what a priest is in his mind. When reality does not match this image, this egotist falls into judgment. Egoism, fantasies about others or about how to properly save them, often become an insurmountable barrier preventing us from helping others.

Before you can save others, you must first walk this path yourself. Without it, salvation is impossible.

Before you can save others, you must first walk this path yourself. Without it, salvation is impossible. You cannot understand others without understanding yourself. You cannot do good for others without being truly kind, in your heart, and not just on the surface.

The climax is the priest’s candid account of his poverty and his request for a scribe’s job. Kunin is “almost horrified” to learn about the young priest’s starving family, the doctor’s impoverished situation, and Fr. Yakov’s integrity—the financial support he provides to a seminarian brother and an elderly priest. At this moment, the truth begins to emerge through the husk of the nobleman’s contempt: Be ye therefore merciful, as your Father also is merciful. (Luke 6:36). Kunin finally sees not the image he made up, but real suffering. But the cost of this insight is such that in reality his life seems to him a dark, dreary nightmare. This is not because of the village squalor. This is about the state of the soul that wanted to love, but could not because of its selfishness.

The Cossack”: The Point of No Return

"The Cossack", a short story by Anton Chekhov. Cover. Published by the Parish of the Descent of the Holy Spirit"The Cossack", a short story by Anton Chekhov. Cover. Published by the Parish of the Descent of the Holy SpiritFinally, a year later, in April 1887, the third story, “The Cossack,” was published. Chekhov wrote it in Taganrog, and it appeared in the Petersburg Gazette on April 13.

The action takes place on Pascha night. Maxim, a young tenant of a farm, is returning home from church with his young wife. He has a freshly blessed Easter cake in his cart. He is filled with Paschal joy, and everything around him seems bright, cheerful, and happy. On their way, the couple encounters a red-haired Cossack sitting on the ground. It turns out that the Cossack fell ill on the road while traveling home for a visit, and now he lacks the strength to continue his journey. He asks the passers-by for a small piece of “holy Paschal cake to break the fast.” Maxim immediately wants to share it with him, but his wife forbids him to cut the kulich, believing that it is “not proper” to do so and that the consecrated Kulich should only be eaten at home, during the festive meal. The couple leaves without giving the poor man anything. From that moment on, Maxim’s joy disappears. His conscience begins to torment him. He cannot sleep, cannot pray, and cannot celebrate the Resurrection of Christ.

The couple leaves without giving the poor man anything. From that moment on, Maxim’s joy disappears. His conscience begins to torment him. He cannot sleep, cannot pray, and cannot celebrate the Resurrection of Christ.

He tries to drown his sadness in wine, and ends up drinking himself to death. As a result, his previously happy and prosperous life is shattered.

This is chronologically the most recent story. And it is here that Chekhov shows the most tragic ending. While in “The Witch” we see a soul that is already dead, and in “The Nightmare” a soul that is poisoned by selfishness, in “The Cossack” we see a man who had everything—the joy of Pascha, the love of his wife, and his faith—but lost it all in a single cruel act, a single refusal to show mercy.

Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy (Matthew 5:7). Maxim did not show mercy when it was most important, when it was truly needed. And mercy was taken away from him.

What is Chekhov talking about? He is talking about the fact that Paschal joy can be lost in an instant. And it can be lost without committing a mortal sin, but “just” by being heartless. Maxim did not kill or steal, he simply listened to his wife and did not show mercy by giving the Cossack a bit of kulich. However, God does not look at appearances, but at the inner workings of the heart. Essentially, this was a fall from grace similar to the first fall in human history.

Essentially, this was a fall from grace similar to the first fall in human history.

And here’s another Chekhovian insight: People often drink because they’re trying to drown out the tormenting voice of their conscience. Many people don’t want to admit their guilt, don’t want to repent and come to Christ, so they seek oblivion in alcohol, work, entertainment, or anything else but the Church. And it all starts with a seemingly small unkind act. An Apocalypse of Small Sins…

What unites these three stories?

“The Witch,” “The Nightmare,” and “The Cossack” are three different stories with three different main characters. However, each story revolves around a person who has not fostered love in his heart.

  • Saveliy (“The Witch”) did not cultivate love, and he turned his own family into hell by accusing his wife of witchcraft instead of repenting of his callousness.

  • Kunin (“Nightmare”) did not cultivate love, and the world around him became a nightmare because he saw not people, but his fantasies about them.

  • Maxim (“The Cossack”) did not cultivate love, and he lost his Paschal joy, which was replaced by melancholy and drunkenness.

Chekhov’s main lesson is that only love makes life happy, meaningful, whole, and saving.

Chekhov’s main lesson is that only love makes life happy, meaningful, whole, and saving. However, love depends primarily on us, our free will, efforts, and labor. If a person has not cultivated love for God and their neighbor, they are doomed to an empty, spiteful, and resentful existence, leading to the destruction of themselves and everyone they come into contact with.

Understanding and pity

According to researchers, the main feature of Chekhov’s vision of reality is his sincere love for his characters, no matter who they are. He did not write “hagiographies,” but rather wrote about us. He did not have any villains. Instead, he portrayed unfortunate individuals. Saveliy is unfortunate due to his suspicious nature. Kunin is unfortunate due to his selfishness. Maxim is unfortunate due to his guilty conscience. Chekhov completely lacks a judgmental attitude towards people.

This is the secret of Chekhov’s approach. He doesn’t judge anyone in his works, but he tries to understand and sympathize with them because he loves them. And he succeeds because he sees the main disease: the absence of love. He points out the only cure: to let go of your prejudices, to look into the face of someone close to you, and to ask them what they truly need.

Charity suffereth long, and is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up, doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil; (1 Cor. 13:4–5).

Priest Tarasiy Borozenets
Translation by Myron Platte

Pravoslavie.ru

6/22/2026

LITURGIA DE LOS SANTOS PEDRO Y PAULO EN SAN PETERSBURGO PRECIOSO Y SOLEMNE

 https://www.youtube.com/live/GOUDyN17uQw?si=Pr5Cf9VTnKIOb-Rd

2026-06-29

 A FLAGELO TERREMOTO LIBERA NOS, DOMINE

 

Canto en el silencio de mi celda las letanías mayores, en la liturgia católica es un himno penitencial oficiado en tiempos de  grandes calamidades. El flagelo de los dos sismos padecidos por el país hermano nos dejaron sin aliento y suplicamos a Cristo Redentor que cuide de las pobres almas de los fallecidos y encuentren ayuda los damnificados que lo perdieron todo. ¿Trump? Mejor no hablar de ese malvado y sus compinches. Su comportamiento con Caracas no pudo ser más tiránico. Ya en este blog aireamos la sospecha de una mano criminal. La armada gringa bojando les costas del caribeño país. Uno de los buques desplegaba armas atómicas. Hay que ser bestia para tirar una bomba nuclear que acabaría con cualquier resistencia y evitaría una guerra larga y sangrienta en la trasera de los estados unidos, hay que ser gente sucia y sibilina para un comportamiento así pero los yanquis son de esa manera. Se llevaron a su presidente Maduro a Nueva York. ¿A costa de qué? ¿Unas maniobras nucleares en el Caribe? También son torticeros y filtran la información del modo que les conviene. A los hispanos no nos queda otro remedio que elevar los ojos al cielo y recitar las letanías mayores: “del flagelo del terremoto líbranos, Señor, de la peste la guerra, la muerte repentina. Del espíritu de la fornicación. Ab ira tua libera nos, Domine.” Hoy día de san Pedro.

 

lunes, 29 de junio de 2026

 

 

MISA PONTIFICAL DE SAN PEDRO EN VATICANO

 https://www.youtube.com/live/OvvV2wGpGvs?si=O53YPqwujI678Rvb

2026-06-26

A TRUMP SE LE ATRAGANTA CALIFORNIA EL MAYOR ESTADO DE LA UNION EL MAS IMPORTNTE

 

California’s ‘first partner’ targeted by Trump, Newsom says. Here is what we know about her career, finances

Jennifer Siebel Newsom
California First Partner Jennifer Siebel Newsom in 2023.
(Christina House / Los Angeles Times)
  • Click here to listen to this article

See more from the L.A. Times in Google Search. Set us as preferred 

  • Gov. Gavin Newsom says the Trump administration is targeting California’s “first partner,” Jennifer Siebel Newsom, probing her charity and business finances in what he calls a politically motivated abuse of power.
  • At the center are nonprofits and a production company she founded, which have funneled millions in donations, contracts and behested payments from corporations and powerful interests into her work as a filmmaker and gender equity advocate.
  • The case spotlights California’s loose behested-payment rules, potential conflicts of interest and questions over whether private benefit from Siebel Newsom’s advocacy eclipses the public good she champions.

Jennifer Siebel Newsom has spent more than a decade cultivating an identity distinct from her husband, Gov. Gavin Newsom, as an active documentary filmmaker and gender equity activist with her own organizations, staff and salary.

The 51-year-old calls herself California’s “first partner,” a title she coined herself to signal an equal footing with the governor and gender inclusivity.

Now, the governor says the Trump administration is targeting his wife, investigating her charity and business finances in what he calls a politically motivated abuse of power. At the center of that probe are the nonprofits and a production company she founded, which have received millions in donations over the years from corporations and political interests in the state.

Among the entities she has founded or led are the Representation Project, a nonprofit that advocates for gender equity through film and education programs, and Girls Club Entertainment, a for-profit production company she owns that holds the copyrights to her documentaries. She also founded the California Partners Project, a second nonprofit that works closely with her government office and receives donations solicited by the governor, though she does not draw a salary from the organization.

Since its creation in 2020, the California Partners Project has received nearly $5.1 million from so-called “behested payments,” a practice in which private donations are made to organizations at the urging of government officials. The system has raised alarms over the years about the influence large companies have amassed in Sacramento.

California law allows officials to solicit donations to specific charitable or governmental causes when the payments are reported within 30 days. The public donation system, however, came under scrutiny in 2020 when payments made at Newsom’s behest — to a variety of organizations, not just the California Partners Project — ballooned to an unprecedented $226 million to help fund the response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

While not illegal, behested payments often push “the bounds of campaign finance law,“ said David McCuan, a political science professor at Sonoma State University. As political back-and-forth between Newsom and President Trump escalates, he said, payments to the first partner’s nonprofits could be “a rich target for scrutiny.”

The governor has accused the Trump administration — specifically, the FBI and the Internal Revenue Service — of questioning their friends and former employees about him and his wife. The governor said the probes are politically motivated, a personal vendetta because he’s considering a run for president in 2028. His office alleged that federal authorities began contacting associates of the governor and his wife around the time Trump announced he planned to nominate Todd Blanche, his former personal attorney, as attorney general.

Since Trump returned to the White House, he has promised to seek retribution against those he considers his political rivals. His Justice Department has pursued charges against many of them, including former FBI Director James B. Comey and New York Atty. Gen. Letitia James.

The Justice Department and FBI have not commented on the Siebel Newsom investigation. A source who was not authorized to speak publicly told The Times that two separate probes originated last year in the U.S. attorney’s office in Sacramento as a result of whistleblower reports regarding Siebel Newsom’s taxes and Dana Williamson, Newsom’s former chief of staff. Last month Williamson pleaded guilty to fraud charges in an investigation that began in 2022 under the Biden administration.

Newsom said he and his wife have nothing to hide, and promised to release all of his recent tax returns — though he has not announced when.

In turn, the governor has demanded that the Department of Justice release all records pertaining to the probe.

“The American people deserve to know who ordered this abuse of power and how far it goes,” the governor wrote on social media last week.

“These are dark days in our nation’s history when the leader of the free world spews animus openly and without shame — aiming to silence and destroy not only his political opponents, but their friends, colleagues, and families,” Siebel Newsom said in a statement to The Times. ”My husband and I will continue to push back on this vindictive attack — and I certainly will not let this distract me from the important work ahead to protect the health, wealth, and safety of women and children and give California kids the best start in life. Together, we can set an example of strong leadership that protects people rather than preys on them.”

To better understand the finances, here is a breakdown of how Siebel Newsom’s company and nonprofits are working.

The Representation Project

Alongside the release of her first documentary, “Miss Representation,” in 2011, Siebel Newsom created her nonprofit, which originally shared the same name as her film. The organization licenses her films and reimburses costs to her production company.

The nonprofit earns some revenue from licensing the first partner’s documentaries for use in classrooms, college campuses and workplaces. Licensing for film screenings at schools starts at $49, while corporate licensing for her films starts at $995; purchase of screening rights also comes with curricula to facilitate discussions.

The Representation Project has earned more than $5.2 million in revenue from film screenings, licensing and speaking fees since 2011, according to a review of its tax filings.

The Representation Project is not required to disclose its donors but has received at least $2.6 million since 2014 from various charitable foundations that disclosed the gifts in their own tax filings. Several corporations that have had business before the state have donated to Siebel Newsom’s nonprofit, including Pacific Gas & Electric Co., AT&T and Kaiser Permanente.

Its past donors also include entrepreneur and progressive donor Susie Thompkins Buell, who is credited as a producer on several of Siebel Newsom’s documentaries, as well as the Marin Community Foundation and Onward Together, the political action organization founded by Hillary Clinton.

Four months after Newsom took office in 2019, the state Department of Education recommended that high schools screen two of his wife’s films, “Miss Representation” and “The Mask You Live In,” a move that has garnered criticism from conservative media outlets. The state said the films “can help facilitate a discussion about the impact of mass media and gender socialization on self-image and relationships with others.”

Though it does not specify where its films have been licensed, the nonprofit boasts in annual impact reports that its films and curricula have “reached over 2 million students” and “are being used in over 5,000 schools in fifty U.S. states.”

Since founding the Representation Project in 2011, Siebel Newsom has received more than $1.9 million in compensation from the nonprofit organization, according to a review of federal tax records. Her separately owned film production company, Girls Club Entertainment, has collected about $2.2 million in independent contracts from the nonprofit over that same period, records show.

Her current annual salary is $161,250 for a 40-hour workweek, records show. Siebel Newsom earns income from both her production company and her nonprofit, according to state financial disclosures.

Jeff Tenenbaum, a nonprofit attorney with 30 years of experience advising nonprofit, tax-exempt organizations, declined to comment on Siebel Newsom’s specific case. He said though, speaking generally, that there is a “private benefit doctrine” provision in the law that governs whether a federally tax exempt organization’s activities unduly benefit any single individual, including through indirect payments to entities they own.

The doctrine does not prohibit all private benefit, he said, only what the federal tax code calls “impermissible” private benefit, and that determination would be made only after a full review of the organization’s finances and contracts.

Girls Club Entertainment

An actor and documentary filmmaker, Siebel Newsom founded her production company to develop independent films with a focus on combating gender stereotypes and empowering girls and women. She serves as the company’s chief creative officer.

She has written, produced and directed five films exploring themes of inequality and traditional gender roles. Siebel Newsom is best known for her 2011 documentary “Miss Representation,” which focused on the few and narrow representations of girls and women in American media.

Tax records show that the production company owns the rights to “Miss Representation” and has licensed the film to the Representation Project for a minimum of seven years for the purpose of distributing and screening the film in public. Costs associated with film production — including the writer, director and producer fees — have been reimbursed by the Representation Project, tax filings show.

Her latest documentary, “Miss Representation: Rise Up,” examines “the rising backlash against women’s progress and the hostile landscape of technology designed to harass and, ultimately, silence women.” The film premiered this month at the Tribeca Film Festival.

California Partners Project

In 2020, Siebel Newsom founded the California Partners Project, a nonprofit focused on improving gender equity in the workplace and the safety and well-being of children in online spaces. She does not collect compensation from the nonprofit or serve on its board.

It hosts an annual “gender equity summit” and provides resources for parents on issues such as social media safety and child mental health.

The California Partners Project also does not publicly disclose its donors in its tax filings, but much of the nonprofit’s funding appears to come from behested payments. Siebel Newsom does not receive a salary from the organization.

Since its founding, the Newsoms have steered more than $5 million to the nonprofit via behested payments, according to a review of the disclosures. While many donations to the California Partners Project come from charitable foundations, it also received hundreds of thousands from companies including Silicon Valley Bank, Pinterest and the charitable arm of Blue Shield of California.

Its biggest funder is the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria, a Sonoma County tribe that operates a casino in Rohnert Park and spends heavily in state and federal elections. The tribe has given $2.3 million to the nonprofit since 2022. In June 2023, Newsom appointed tribal Chairman Greg Sarris to the University of California Board of Regents. Newsom has also supported efforts by the tribe to block a smaller tribe from building a casino in nearby Vallejo.

Blue Shield, a giant nonprofit health insurer that has reported giving $100,000 to Siebel Newsom’s nonprofit, was an early donor to Newsom’s 2018 campaign for governor and later received a $15-million no-bid contract to distribute COVID vaccines. State regulators in 2024 also signed off on the nonprofit’s request to restructure and establish a new parent corporation out of state, a move that raised alarm among healthcare advocates.

The California Partners Project did not respond to questions about its donors and spending.

More to Read

 VUELVEN LOS BUITRES DE LA DERECHUZA

 

Ahí esta llegaron ya los buitres de la derechuza el Andrés Trapiello, Luis Alberto Cuenca, gentuza de las derechas, yo soy un falangista de izquierdas. Prefiero a Sanchez y deje las cosas como están.  Ni Trapiello ni Cuenca saben literatura, son cultivadores del ripio malo

 A POR LOS DACHOS

 

ESPAÑA MI NATURA ITALIA MI VENTURA Y FLANDES MI SEPULTURA. A POR LOS DUTCH. PERO SOBRE LA FINAL PLANEA LA SOMBRA DE LOS BOER Y ENCIMA UN ÁRBITRO INGLÉS.

 

En mis viajes por Europa, me sorprendió el odio casi africano que en los Países Bajos se alimenta todavía hacia los españoles. A los niños, para asustarles, se les dice que viene el Duque de Alba, en vez de que viene el coco. Son prejuicios raciales. Por eso yo nunca abriré una cuenta naranja porque me escuecen los recuerdos de Guillermo de Orange. Holanda es la cuna de las fementidas guerras de religión del XVI, motivadas por el fundamentalismo evangélico de Lutero, la insensibilidad de Roma al no rectificar a tiempo sus muchos errores medievales, la codicia de los electores, la animadversión hacia el emperador financiada por los banqueros de la judería de Ámsterdam, las burradas consensuales de Erasmo (“al que no le guste Erasmo o es fraile o es asno”, dicho castellano de cuando entonces), que alimentaría la hoguera de la leyenda negra cuyos rescoldos aun se atizan. Guillermo de Orange, el de la Batalla del Boyne, cuyo caballo blanco y su chambergo cual lambrequín flameante aun se puede ver en el hastial de algunas casas en el sector protestante de Belfast, al unísono con los ingleses fueron los grandes enemigos del catolicismo puro y duro y de España en general. Non placet Hispania solía repetir Erasmo. Claro el duque de Alba se encargó de suprimir a sangre y fuego los levantamientos de aquellas provincias levantiscas y que otrora fueron españolas. Yo aconsejaría a Del Bosque que alinease al Duque de alba o a don Alejandro de Farnesio en el once que se batirá mañana con Holanda en el Soccer City de Johannesburgo. Con sus tercios de Flandes serían dos medias puntas capaces de dar buen malón, tanto como Iniesta, Villa o el Niño, a los Dachos. Sin embargo, me huele a chamusquina y casi a hoguera de la noche de San Bartolomé el que la FIFA haya designado para regir este encuentro al inglés Mister Webb. Esos señores del silbato, hijos de la Gran Bretaña, por ser vos quien sois, hijos de la gran puta, siempre arbitraron contra nuestros intereses. Matías Prats estará revolviéndose seguramente en su tumba pues este Webb nos trae a la memoria de los aficionados a la Selección Española el recuerdo de aquel Mr. Illis que en un partido con Checoslovaquia nos escatomeó un penalti, no vio otro en contra y mostró la roja a Luisito Suárez en el Mundial de Chile. Puede haber gato encerrado, amaños, pucherazos y cacerolas. La intención se sospecha bajo cuerda es que la FIFA quiere que Holanda, que fue la potencia colonizadora de Sudáfrica hasta que los ingleses echaran a los Boer, cristianos fundamentalistas y racistas, de la regencia de la vieja colonia. Sería una fórmula de entendimiento y de perdón de los posibles pecados históricos donde la Gran Bretaña ha campado siempre a su aire con su típica balanza de poderes. Además, Londres sede se entendió siempre bien con Ámsterdam, las dos sedes del capitalismo, para contrarrestar el poderío de Alemania y de Francia. Balanza de poderes. A lo mejor la política acaba inmiscuyéndose en el fútbol. Bueno el fútbol es política. Sin embargo, en el otro platillo de la balanza tenemos que nuestra “Roja” va a vestir de azul. Y el azul es el color de nuestra suerte. Además, el Pulpo Pol pronostica una victoria española. Sin embargo, yo por si las moscas, eufórico como estoy de esa ilusión de españolismo que nos hicieron vivir estos muchachos y esa traca de fervor por la roja y gualda – y que se jodan los del Estatuto Prostituto y la ikurriña- alinearía de extremo izquierdo al Duque de Alba para que le achicara balones al Guaje y al gran Iniesta o a Javi que es un coloso, al grito que nos dio el triunfo en los Campeonatos de Amberes de los años 20: “ A mí, Sabino, que los arrollo”, o el de “España mi natura” que proclamaban los Tercios Viejos. Y que Dios reparta suerte.

 

10/07/2010